- Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset update#
- Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset pro#
- Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset free#
Ever since I started covering this issue, I’ve gotten swathes of hate mail over the years for even suggesting that anything was wrong, so there is a large percentage of users, for whom the exiting conversion is either good enough, or they just don’t care. It’s also worth remembering that Fuji has a relatively small market share, and within that, a large percentage do just use Lightroom as it is and are happy with it. It wouldn’t be really justifiable reengineering the entire system just for a small number of users. I'm sure some will argue with this explaination but it makes sense to me.Īdobe believes that many X-Trans shooters are happy with the way Lightroom handles most RAW files (which I can sort of confirm given the backlash I got when I first tried to help people with the problem), and it’s only a small number of users and a small number of images that have signifiant issues. I guess that other applications can approach this differently because they either don't have this legacy or are willing to break backwards compatibility.
Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset update#
That means, if you edit a RAW file from 12 years ago in the latest version of Lightroom today and update to the latest process version, the look and feel of the image with be very close, and you’d have access to all of the latest tools.īecause "fixing" the X-Trans issues would have required significantly changing the most vital part of the rendering process - the demosiacing - It would have required significant engineering effort to change it for X-Trans rendering and not break the backwards compatibility, and may not have been possible without affecting the way the system works. Lightroom and camera RAW was designed to maintain backward compatibility and non destructive editing, all the way back to the original version and be fully non destructive. Why did they go to such a roundabout way of addressing X-Trans files, and not just fix the original demosaicing? I did ask, and based on what I was told this is my understanding of it:Īs I've already said, "Enhance Details" was not designed specifically for X-Trans files, and is doing some advanced computational imaging to improve the quality of all RAW files. Now, I know what people are going to say.
Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset pro#
On my 2012 Mac Pro it doesn’t work at all as my GPU is too old. I should point out though that my MacBook pro is quite old, and on newer systems with a better GPU this should be much faster. It should be noted though, that this is doing far more than X-Transformer, and in my testing, for some images there is clearly a difference. Compare that to X-Transformer, which takes around 15-20 seconds. On my old MacBook Pro it takes around 1 to 2 minutes on a Fuji file. Adobe doesn’t think that this is something that you would use to batch process images (although you can), but should be used on one image at a time. It requires a relatively modern GPU, and it can take some time to process. It’s very processor intensive, and therefore slow. On non Fuji files, there is also clearly a visible difference when examining details - at least in the files I've tried. It produces extremely clean and detailed images from your X-Trans files, and is probably of a higher quality than X-Transformer in certain circumstances. I’ve had access to an early version and based on my initial testing, it’s very effective.
Adobe lightroom classic cc fuji raf film preset free#
When used with an X-Trans file, it creates an artifact free image, that doesn’t have any of the issues that Lightroom normally has. Adobe claims that this process can extract an additional 30% of detail from a RAW file. It should be noted that this isn’t designed specifically for X-Trans and is compatible with all raw files. If you are familiar with X-Transformer, it works in a similar way, in that it creates a DNG with improved demosaicing.
It creates a new linearised DNG file, which still has the edibility of a RAW file. Instead, Adobe has a new feature called “Enhance Details” which uses machine learning and AI to improve the quality of demosaicing in Lightroom. If you were hoping that there was a new process version which would automatically improve the rendering of all of your X-Trans files, then I’m afraid that you’re out of luck. Well, sort of, as it’s probably not the solution that many were expecting. Today, Adobe has released a new version of Lightroom which finally addresses the X-Trans issue. Others have switched away from Lightroom together to something like Capture One. People have been hoping that Adobe would eventually fix the problem, and turned to other solutions, such as Iridient X-Transformer. There are issues with the way it handles fine details, certain repeating textures and so called “worm artifacts”. Ever since Fuji released its first X-Trans camera, and Adobe added support, many of us who have shot Fuji over the years have been unhappy with how Lightroom handles Fuji files.